Dear Mark, So, when in the equilibrium stage, the box become small, there is one mistake in my system? I don't know where is my mistake!
Best Regards Sara ----- Original Message ----- From: Mark Abraham <mark.abra...@anu.edu.au> To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <gmx-users@gromacs.org> Cc: Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2012 5:48 PM Subject: Re: [gmx-users] equilibrium for box of simulation On 5/10/2012 12:06 AM, mohammad agha wrote: > Dear GROMACS Users, > > I asked this question before but I don't understand it! > > > I placed several materials in my box of simulation for example box with > 6nm*6nm*6nm and my materials are not placed in the smaller box but when I > equilibrate my system, the box became smaller and temperature and pressure > also equilibrate. my question is: is my system and equilibrate mistake, > because of reach to smaller box? Is there equilibriums with reach to smaller > box? At least one of your volume, contents or model physics are not consistent with the others, but only you can say which. Mark -- gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
