On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 10:51:13PM +0200, Udo Giacomozzi wrote: > Hello strk, > > Thursday, October 26, 2006, 8:16:12 PM, you wrote: > >> Damn. Can you fix this (or whoever made the current compatibility > >> layer)? > > s> mmm.. it'a s full header this time. I'm afraid it's going to > s> be nearly equivalent to ship the whole AGG with gnash, which we > s> decided not to do ... > s> Maybe we should just exit with an error from ./configure if AGG > s> required version is not found... > > BTW, version 2.5 came out a few days ago. It's nearly equal to to 2.4 > version but it's released under the GNU license: > http://www.antigrain.com/news/index.html
Excellent ! GPL :D This makes it possible to ship any portion of it, still I'd rather encorage users to download 2.5 if having problems with 2.4... I fixed my problems installing 2.4 actually (not the one in debian testing) but 2.5 will probably make sure nothing is missing ? (unless some *parts* of AGG are intentionally left out due to licensing differences ?) > Do you have any idea why there are differences (in the RPM) at all? Eh... should try to find out. It's a .deb, not an RPM.. As I said, is it possible that portions of AGG are non considered "free" in debian terms ? --strk; _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
