Hello strk, Friday, October 27, 2006, 3:17:08 PM, you wrote: s> gnash::character is used by all except movie_root, but the s> meaning of movie_root itself is not very clear to me. s> I think the only reason for movie_root to derive from movie_interface s> is that movie_def_impl returns a movie_root from create_instace().
A good overview gives http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/manual/doxygen/classgnash_1_1movie__interface.html s> If it returned a movie_instance instead (deriving from sprite_instance, s> which is deriving from character) we'd have a movie_root being s> only a *single* entity for a *whole* run. s> If we can handle to have a *single* movie_root for a *single* play s> (not one each externallhy loaded movie) then I think things get s> much much cleaner. Frankly speaking, I can't answer this. The whole class design seems odd to me. Anyway, any new design must: - be able to walk the complete DisplayList hierarchy - work with movies that have been loaded at runtime (LoadMovie) and are displayed inside the real root movie. Don't know if that's related to movie_interface. Udo _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
