Hello Markus, Tuesday, October 31, 2006, 4:32:25 PM, you wrote: MG> I'm a supporter of OGL but for now I think we miss two features that AGG MG> supports albeit it doesn't work as good as ol' OGL (and requires lots of MG> CPU on some platforms, i.e. MIPS/IRIX).
Interesting. Can you tell me more about the CPU issue? MG> So IMO we should stick to OGL as default until next release. I'd say we should default to whatever is more complete and has less requirements. Not everyone has a OpenGL supported gfx card but the ones who have will probably find the --enable-gui=opengl switch easily. Probably most people expect Gnash to "just work" and the /next/ thing they worry about is speed. Don't know if OpenGL renderer works even if there is no special hardware. In that case it is much less problematic, of course. >> Sounds good to me, multiple gui support doesn't seem a "well supported" >> feature to have into a release (even if alpha) Agree. Udo _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
