Hello strk, Wednesday, July 25, 2007, 1:10:34 AM, you wrote:
s> On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 04:44:35PM -0600, Eric Hughes wrote: >> At 04:14 PM 7/24/2007, strk wrote: >> >Implementing multiple emulation modes would also be challenging (emulate >> >this version on >> >this system, that version on that system). >> >Do we really want to go there ? >> >> My opinion is "yes". s> ... >> I believe Gnash should serve its programmer-users, rather than requiring >> them to serve it. s> I agree on the general principle. What remains to decide is how to s> encode such a super-duper-version thing. In first place the *targeted* version number and, if necessary, operating system too. Personally I'm not convinced that the O/S matters since if at all, people will only worry about the Windows player. But anyway... s> I started a thread on flashcoders mailing list, I suggest gnash s> developers join that list as it's a pretty crowded bunch of flash s> coders there.. Good. They should "decide" where we want to go. Interesting that they consider Gnash for primary testing platform... :) Udo _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
