Hello strk, Tuesday, July 31, 2007, 6:08:54 PM, you wrote: s> So the answer would still be : which player version is to be s> considered normative when different versions (and on different s> archs) behave differently ?
Good question. Different versions: Preferably the newer one as I consider minor version numbers as bug fixes. But I'd really don't care that much unless we really know the difference (NaN thing). Different archs? Two possibilities: - keep compatible with the arch (ie. Gnash renders differently on Windows vs. Linux). Might be a problem for archs that are supported by Gnash only. - Simply take the Windows version as the one. What do others (including Flash developers) think about this?? In any case, we should give the *user* the possibility to turn off any self-limitation (if he wants that, he knows what it means). For this reason these should be some central mechanism that controls the limitations. Interested in other opinions, Udo _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
