What would be the harm in a "fork" now that Gnash is using a sane DVCS, finally? strk, put your Gnash in github, publicize its location and let folks who prefer your changes to pull from you. Savannah might hold the "canonical" git repo for Gnash, belonging to Rob, and Rob's free to pull changes he desires from your repo or anyone else's Gnash repo ... and you are free to pull changes from other Gnash repos into yours, as you see fit.
Overall, this will produce a better quality Gnash all around, give people the freedom of choice as to what software they run, reward the people who curate a better version of Gnash than the others, and completely sidestep any dictatorships from even being possible. On 12/8/10 5:50 PM, strk wrote: > For some obscure reason, rob reverted this change > I've made (that took me a long time) w/out explaining > what was wrong with it, except > > "it was better before" > > It's over my head. Once again. > > Last time this happened we almost forked. -- Dossy Shiobara | [email protected] | http://dossy.org/ Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/ "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70) _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
