> Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > The current gnash version seem to work a lot better than the last > > tarball release. Are there plans to wrap up a new tarball? > > Yes, after we achieve a few goals, like getting sound working > again.That broke when we started using a thread to load movies in the > background, which was a major improvement to performance.
The sound broke because the gstreamer backend used a module which needed all sound-data before playback started. This is "only" a problem with sound streams, so event sounds should still work. The solution to the problem is probably to use a different gstreamer module, which we will probably have to write ourselves, or perhaps some changing in the way the code works will do... > While I > wouldn't expect a new tarball in the next week or so, we are working > towards this. We'd also like the next release to include the framebuffer > backend as well, which is lurching into functionality... > Is this the antigrain backend? cheers, Tomas _______________________________________________ Gnash mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash
