Hello Rob, Wednesday, November 8, 2006, 5:22:34 PM, you wrote: >> Can you explain this further? What means "work on Flash technologies"? RS> I'm not a laywer. :-) I just printed out that link to the EULA, I should RS> probably have a real lawyer read it.
I was asking what *you* meant with it :-) >> Untrue. I *do* use and have buyed the IDE. Why shouldn't I? After all >> our (our company's) goal is to use Gnash as an player for embedded RS> I'm going to be more than a little upset if I'm forced to back out all RS> the AGG work. :-( Now I do have to go find a lawyer, unless Adobe RS> decides to supply us with their interpretation of the EULA, and how it RS> applies to developers of Flash technology. This also means I can't now RS> do the 0.7.32 release with AGG included until we have a definite legal RS> opinion. We would have to have gone through this process eventually, but RS> now I have to do it right away... I understand Gnash developers all do constructive work and are no lawyers, but I can't believe this. This would mean when I just *install* the MM/Adobe tools (which implies I accept the EULA) I am practically prohibited to contribute to the Gnash project?? I would accept it that I may not use (in an active manner) the tools to do any reverse-engineering. With other words, I cannot write test cases for Gnash using the Adobe tools. So I would end up using a pirated copy of Flash just to avoid the licence... ;) RS> Most of my other thoughts on this RS> right now are all four letter words not suitable for a public email list. You are not alone. Udo _______________________________________________ Gnash mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash
