-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Possibly, that's the conclusion I'm leaning towards. However, let's
> assume 'T' did exist. So what? IMO, the icmp packets should never have
> gone to 'T' anyway. Shouldn't have gone back out the interface
> they came in on? (this seems logical to me, but then, I think I've
> pretty well established the fact that I don't understand networking
> at the protocol layer :)
To someone who does understand networking at the protocol layer,
it makes as much sense as saying
However, let's assume my thumb did exist next to the nail. So what?
IMO, the hammer should never have hit my thumb anyway. Shouldn't have
gone to hit the nail I wanted to hit? ? (this seems logical to me, ...
- --
John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] / WWW http://www.abreau.net / PGP-Key-ID 0xD5C7B5D9
PGP-Key-Fingerprint 72 FB 39 4F 3C 3B D6 5B E0 C8 5A 6E F1 2C BE 99
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iQCVAwUBPf/MLVV9A5rVx7XZAQLPPQP+PmNHsSmPLhuYOxhGI56NQ9+FFXj+v6RL
DEbAxXDKtnkK7MDZpKw+r4laSvXaGI4Ua/gAsJPqsFAC22YPsfjv90+WU8h/2uTC
RSsiqzYK791OIBspEEO9uiZ7IQrZKRMvTw1yCgEMr4LhE1EqtGPgQDj2YbWoHWEa
O3tUEdMEcCY=
=Tidm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
