On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 04:57:07PM -0400, Tom Buskey wrote: > On 5/11/05, Jeff Kinz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 03:10:56PM -0400, Tom Buskey wrote: > > > Blah blah blah. > > > <insert dead horse reference> > > > <insert arguments about number of angels on the head of a pin> > > > <argument about validity of argument> > > > <insert same old email addresses in procmail rule -> /dev/null> > > > *sigh* > > > > <insert "if you have nothing to say, then don't bother saying it" > > > If that was directed at me, personally, I'm not sure it was called > for. If it was directed at me personally, maybe a public list isn't > the place to do it. > > I had something to say and I didn't want to attack people directly. > Well, maybe the people I see having these long drawn out discussions > that wind up degenerating into dick wars on how to argue, etc. I > don't remember seeing you in these kind of discussions in the past so > it certainly wasn't directed at you. > > btw - if you do feel a need to respond to this on the list, feel free > as long as you quote my whole message.
"oh" I said, in very small voice. "sorry". Hi Tom. Since your post came up as a direct reply to my post (Mutt threads) I assumed you were speaking directly to me. I see that I was wrong and I apologize. Since I did it on the list I feel my apology to you should also be there. (I forgot the "count to 6.023X10^23 before posting in heat" rule) (Anybody got a slice o'humble-pie I can borrow?) -- Jeff Kinz, Re-Detergent Research, Hudson, MA. _______________________________________________ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
