On Jul 15, 2005, at 10:54, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
Postfix (SMTP)
MailScanner (spam/virus/phishing)
Courier/Dovecot (IMAPd -- I use both, and think they both work well)
Squirrelmail (webmail -- lots of functionality, not much overhead)
Amazing how we all converge on the same solutions. :)
One thing for the audience to be aware of - the Postfix site claims
MailScanner does awful things to postfix. Which was true many years
ago, but since then postfix gained the features MailScanner really
needed and since then it uses supported methods - a better model than
when using Sendmail with MailScanner, even.
But... the warning on the Postfix website remains - allegedly due to
some bitter feelings over the situations years ago. Ah, OSS politics.
-Bill
-----
Bill McGonigle, Owner Work: 603.448.4440
BFC Computing, LLC Home: 603.448.1668
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mobile: 603.252.2606
http://www.bfccomputing.com/ Pager: 603.442.1833
AIM: wpmcgonigle Text: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
