On 11/16/05, Python <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 12:03 -0500, Thomas Charron wrote:
The registry, PIR.Org insisted that I had to deal with the registrar,
AIT.
 
  Makes sense.  If you own a domain, in the end, regardless of who you resold it thru, the domain is the registrars responsibility.
 
>   If it's paid up, which it appears to be, tell em you want it fixed
> in the next 24 hours, or taken off hold in 24 hours, or you A) Show up
> with machine guns,
Can I hire you to go with the guns.
 
  Just post on slashdot that they run all windows..  ;-)
 
AIT disagrees with PIR's assessment of the situation.  The Registry
claims to have received a notice from us asking that several hundred
domains be deleted.  That's not how AIT systems work; deletions are a
manual process that cannot be executed en masse.
 
  Sounds like bluff off material to me.  Something screwed up someplace, unless they claimed to recieve 'hundreds of deletions'.  How do you manually request the deletion of hundreds of domains?

I realize this does nothing to alleviate your issue, but I want you to
have an understanding of what's going on.  We have asked the Registry to
restore the affected domains, but it refuses to admit wrongdoing and
insists on restoration fees before doing so.  Our fallback position is
to register secondary domains that point to the main website so affected
customers get relief.
 
  Technically, it sounds like someone screwed up either way.  Whoever you bought it thru has the financial responsibility to fix it, regardless of the cost.
 
So far as I know, the restoration fee is $6.  I'm quite annoyed and have
told both sides that this is ridiculous.  Just bill us the $6 and put
the domain back on the root servers!

No reply to that yet.  I was a bit sarcastic.  I may yet ask you to
supply the heavy fire power.
 
  Hehe, see above.
 
  Thomas

Reply via email to