> I guess that depends on how much you can bend the truth and keep
> a straight face. If a package didn't come from Red Hat's build
> system, it's not a RHEL package. I don't know of anyone freely
> redistributing the RH-built update packages.
Sorry; I should have been clearer. I'm not out to "bend
the truth" or to defraud anybody, it's just that describing
something as an RHEL3 box implies a certain set of features,
package versions and such. If I dragged an arbitrary set of
libs, apps and kernels on board I might end up with a vastly
improved machine, but somebody who was expecting the RHEL3
context might be unhappy with it. I should probably be saying
something like "RHEL3-compatible"...
Thanks to all for the pointers.
_______________________________________________
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
