On 10/17/07, Ben Scott wrote: > On 10/17/07, Bill McGonigle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Additionally please send email either to the listserv or to the poster > >> you are replying to, but not both. > > > > Au contraire, please send messages to both me and the mailing list. > > Au contraire contraire, please do not. Abuse of "Reply All" causes > List Header Cancer!
Couldn't this be solved by the list setting Reply-To: to the list? And yes, I know it considered bad, but currently many email programs don't support a 'Reply To List' function. In mutt, I have to tell it about lists, which of course, just seems lame. In Gmail, Reply To All puts the list in the CC field. Hmmm... if a message has multiple Reply-To's, why not have the MUA reply to all of them? That way a List could add a new Reply-To header without worry about an existing value. I suppose I need to re-read some RFCs. :( -- Jeff Macdonald Ayer, MA _______________________________________________ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/