On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:38:52 -0400 "Mark E. Mallett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sometimes it's good to reboot a system just to make sure you can. That's very old school :-) Back in the days where mainframes had the power of my PDA, operating systems were somewhat unsophisticated. I ran a data center in San Antonio where we ran VM/370 - IBM's virtualization, with the batch os (OS/VS1) in one VM, and CMS for online users - data control and programmers. The thinking back then if we shutdown we may never get the system back up, but this was 1950s mentality. But, memory leaks and things could cause the OS to degrade over time. Today, for the most part, the Linux and Unix kernels really do not need periodic reboots unless there is a problem. On out BLU mail server we've seen that the routing table gets screwed up and is difficult to fix. In any case, since nearly every service and driver can be stopped and started remotely, the only reason I might want to reboot other than a kernel upgrade is that it might be faster to reboot than to try to fix an issue, but that tends to be more of a Microsoft mentality, but Windows Server has become more stable also. -- -- Jerry Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/