I don't get it. Shouldn't we want to know about upcoming speakers?
I _do_ understand about the overall volume of the list - it's a problem
for any active community, and gets worse as the community get healthier.
(E.g., if the complaint about "flurry" referred to things such as my
posting of attorneys' briefs, for instance,... right on; that's a
debatable use of bandwidth.)
But he didn't want to know Ted T'so was going to speak? Or that there
is to be a presentation on Apache? Or one by Mission Critical Linux?
I'd think information about meetings would be the one thing most
worthy of bandwidth; the last thing we'd want to see dropped.
-Bill
Jerry Kubeck wrote:
>
> Robert,
>
> In response to your email below, I am sure that there are a few others that
> feel the way you do.
> >If this last message from you is likely to be the last for a while
> >following the recent flurry, fine, otherwise, please unsubscribe me from
> >your mailing list - the volume has been too high.
> >
> >--Robert
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
