On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 07:23:52PM -0400, Derek Martin 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> text?  Why should I, the recipient, be forced to launch some lame, bloated
> application (microsoft or otherwise) just to read a five-line e-mail?
> 
> In practice, the answer is, I don't.  The e-mail goes unread.  As did this
> one.

    While I agree in principle, in this case you don't have to launch a
lame, bloated application.  Use OSS!  In my case, mutt reads the email,
invokes wvHtml on the attachment, w3m dumps the resulting HTML file to
text, and mutt appends that to the message, which is then pageable as a
whole within mutt.  So it looks just like a text attachment.  I almost
didn't even noticed it was a Word attachment.

P.S.  If you're wondering, I've been contributing a little to mutt,
hence my enthusiasm and advocacy. :-)

-- 
Bob Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 "Microsoft has never been an innovator - it's a fast follower.  And
  when you're as big and dominant as Microsoft, and growing at 30 or 40
  percent a year, it gets harder and harder to find people to be fast
  followers of."
   -- Paul Saffo, Institute for the Future

**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************

Reply via email to