In a message dated: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 14:47:47 EDT
Brian Chabot said:
>So I had him chmod 4755 the binary. This works as a temperary solution,
>but as it is this binary they are working on, it would require all the
>users to have sudo and that would defeat the purpose.
Ahhhm, I think you misunderstand sudo, it has very fine grained ACLs,
and can even be configured to allow specified commands to be run
without providing a password.
>So... He suggested that we chmod the *interface* device. AKA, eth1.
>Might work. But, in RH7.3, I can't locate the device name in /dev for
>eth1!
>
>Any ideas here?
Are they using devfs?
--
Seeya,
Paul
----
It may look like I'm just sitting here doing nothing,
but I'm really actively waiting for all my problems to go away.
If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right!
*****************************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body.
*****************************************************************
