On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 14:17 -0600, Daniel Espinosa wrote: > I plan to do the following API changes: > > In libgda: > > gda_query_field_is_parameter to gda_query_field_get_is_parameter > > gda_entity_field_get_g_type to gda_entity_field_get_data_type
Sounds good to me. > A sugestion: > > Could I move the gda_dict_field_set_dict_type as a virtual method in > GdaEntityField (as a gda_entity_field_set_dict_type)? > This is to avoid some errors in API autogeneration in C# bindings > (there are other methods to avoid this using Gda.metadata rules, then > this isn't a problem). Is this because two functions seem to have the same name? -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gnome-db-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
