2007/1/12, Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 14:17 -0600, Daniel Espinosa wrote: > > I plan to do the following API changes: > > > > In libgda: > > > > gda_query_field_is_parameter to gda_query_field_get_is_parameter > > > > gda_entity_field_get_g_type to gda_entity_field_get_data_type > > Sounds good to me. >
I'm preparing the patch... > > A sugestion: > > > > Could I move the gda_dict_field_set_dict_type as a virtual method in > > GdaEntityField (as a gda_entity_field_set_dict_type)? > > This is to avoid some errors in API autogeneration in C# bindings > > (there are other methods to avoid this using Gda.metadata rules, then > > this isn't a problem). > > Is this because two functions seem to have the same name? > The actual implementation confuse Mono auto code generator... but this is a real concern, I'm fixing some API issues in some objects... -- Trabajar, la mejor arma para tu superación "de grano en grano, se hace la arena" (R) (entrámite, pero para los cuates: LIBRE) _______________________________________________ gnome-db-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
