On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 09:11 +0100, Vivien Malerba wrote: > On 1/16/07, Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As noticed in this bug report: > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389821 > > > > libgnomedb uses GtkLinkButton here: > > http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/libgnomedb/trunk/libgnomedb/gnome-db-transaction-status.c?view=markup > > > > That requires GTK+ 2.10. I am generally in favor of keeping in sync with > > the GNOME release schedule, but I need to use libgnomedb on Debian Etch, > > which has only GTK+ 2.8. Would it be OK to #ifdef it out? > > Could you instead modify the configure.in file to detect GTK+ version > and then #ifdef the 2.10 specific part depending on the version of > GTK+? This would help me because I want to remove the GnomeDruid usage > (use GtkAssistant instead), and I could use the same method.
OK. But I can just use the existing GTK_MINOR_VERSION macro. I really doubt that GtkLinkButton is a sensible thing to use for this GnomeDbTransactionStatus UI anyway, but I don't know how to see it in the test. -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gnome-db-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
