On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 11:11 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote: > On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 10:12 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote: > > > Could you instead modify the configure.in file to detect GTK+ version > > > and then #ifdef the 2.10 specific part depending on the version of > > > GTK+? This would help me because I want to remove the GnomeDruid usage > > > (use GtkAssistant instead), and I could use the same method. > > > > OK. But I can just use the existing GTK_MINOR_VERSION macro. > > > > I really doubt that GtkLinkButton is a sensible thing to use for this > > GnomeDbTransactionStatus UI anyway, but I don't know how to see it in > > the test. > > I have done that. > > I also noticed that the new picture stuff uses glib/gbase64.h, which is > only in glib 2.12. We really need an alternative for that, or we need to > ifdef out whatever needs it.
Actually, I now see that there is a local copy of that file, so I guess that this bug is just old: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=355394 -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gnome-db-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
