2007/1/22, Vivien Malerba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi! > > As you'll notice in SVN, Libgnomedb now has 2 .pc files: one for the > main library, and one for the graph library. The advantages of this > new situation is that: > - one can use libgnomedb without the graph library if it's not needed, > and thus reduces the dependencies and memory consumption > - building and istalling the graph library is optional, and done only > is the GnomeCanvas library is found. > > The question I'm asking is if the "core" libgnomedb library should be > split into two parts as well: one for the data bound widgets (form, > grid, etc) and one for the "administrative" widgets such as the > widgets to handle DSNs, or to show the contents of a dictionary. This > would allow to further reduce memory consumption for applications > which only require data bound widgets. What do you think? >
I'm with you, split all in small parts to allow port gnome-db to any other plataforms or widgets sets, I don't know but may other toolkits :-) or projects like maemo could be. -- Trabajar, la mejor arma para tu superación "de grano en grano, se hace la arena" (R) (entrámite, pero para los cuates: LIBRE) _______________________________________________ gnome-db-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
