On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 22:08 +0100, Vivien Malerba wrote: > On 1/27/07, Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 14:46 +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 14:32 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 13:48 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote: > > > > > Can we also have some more regular tarball releases please, so it's > > > > > easier for the C++ bindings to be buildable with specific releases. > > > > > > > > By the way, I am happy to do these at random intervals, if that's OK. I > > > > will probably leave the announcements to someone else. > > > > > > > if you fill in the NEWS file and then do the tarball, I can do the > > > announcement (and the SVN tagging if you haven't) whenever you tell me > > > to do so. > > > > I have now released the 2.99.3 tarballs for libgda and libgnomedb, and > > created the svn tags. > > Did you make an announcement, copy the tarballs, etc because if you > haven't, then I'd like to include my latest commits to the new release > as it changes quite a few thing specially in libgnomedb.
No, I haven't announced it, but there's no problem with doing another release soon, and no reason to wait too long before doing releases. Is anything else on the way? > > I have committed lots of patches from bugzilla, and generally cleaned up > > the list of bugs. The libgda and libgnomedb bugzilla reports have been > > ignored for a long time, and we need to do a better job of this. > > Yes, aggreed... -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gnome-db-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
