2007/1/23, Vivien Malerba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 1/22/07, Daniel Espinosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2007/1/22, Vivien Malerba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Hi! > > > > > > As you'll notice in SVN, Libgnomedb now has 2 .pc files: one for the > > > main library, and one for the graph library. The advantages of this > > > new situation is that: > > > - one can use libgnomedb without the graph library if it's not needed, > > > and thus reduces the dependencies and memory consumption > > > - building and istalling the graph library is optional, and done only > > > is the GnomeCanvas library is found. > > > > > > The question I'm asking is if the "core" libgnomedb library should be > > > split into two parts as well: one for the data bound widgets (form, > > > grid, etc) and one for the "administrative" widgets such as the > > > widgets to handle DSNs, or to show the contents of a dictionary. This > > > would allow to further reduce memory consumption for applications > > > which only require data bound widgets. What do you think? > > > > > > > I'm with you, split all in small parts to allow port gnome-db to any > > other plataforms or widgets sets, I don't know but may other toolkits > > :-) or projects like maemo could be. > > > > Libgnomedb now is composed of 3 libraries: > * libgnomedb.so (along with libgnomedb_handlers.so 97K stripped) which > contains the "minimum" to have data bound widgets and is about 287K > (stripped) on my box > * libgnomedb-extra.so which has the GnomeDbSelector, > GnomeDbDbmsUpdateViewer, GnomeDbReportEditor and GnomeDbGrayBar > widgets for 88K (stripped) > * libgnomedb-graph.so which contain GnomeCanvas related widgets for > 108K stripped. >
With this changes the gnomedb-sharp must create one DLL file with each library so if you install just a part you can use the C# binding for it. -- Trabajar, la mejor arma para tu superación "de grano en grano, se hace la arena" (R) (entrámite, pero para los cuates: LIBRE) _______________________________________________ gnome-db-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
