2006/12/28, Wouter Bolsterlee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2006-12-28 klockan 11:49 skrev Kalle Vahlman: > This wasn't intended a programming language flame...
Nor was I taking it as one. The pun was directed at the whole notion of discussing yet again of the same, already decided point. Of the everlasting issue of which language is prettier/faster/better than the others. > > P.S. If you don't spot the sarcasm, please ignore this message > > ...I was just trying to say that the argument doesn't hold since we already > have widely used OO languages in the Gnome stack. Sure. And if one looks at the original discussion, it's obvious mono/C# isn't supported because GNOME would have lacked OO-languages, but instead because GNOME would benefit from the cool apps that are written with it. The same _will_ be an option for D once there is nice and stable bindings to GNOME[1] and some seriously cool GNOME-integrated apps for it. I'm all for including apps made in D and all the other pretty languages in the world, but obviously they need to have rocking GNOME bindings and killer apps first. It's not a question of which is prettier. [1] Not sure if it has already? -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi Interesting stuff at http://syslog.movial.fi _______________________________________________ gnome-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-devel-list
