It would be great if we could get someone to make OSX binaries.  Do
you have any expertise in this area Patrick?

-Chris S.

On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Patrick Tulskie
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Ok great.  I'll have to give it a shot this weekend then.  I'm just
> tired of how buggy and slow Quicksilver has been I'm curious as to
> whether or not this will be a good replacement.
>
> On Mar 27, 12:38 am, David Siegel <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Yes, a few have built and run Do on OS X. It should be pretty easy to do
>> these days. Grab Macports, Mono, and chase dependencies until it runs.
>>
>> David
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Patrick Tulskie
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Just out of curiosity - has anyone tried to build Do on OS X?  Are
>> > there any reasons why it wouldn't build?  My initial interest in Do
>> > was to get it working on Windows, but since I haven't used a Windows
>> > box in months, I've kind passed on that idea.
>>
>>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"GNOME Do" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/gnome-do?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to