An application can't suddenly change into a .app folder, even if you got it
to build it would be a simple PE file you'll need to manually launch with
Mono that can't launch anything. :-) libdo is pretty annoying when doing
cross-platform stuff, sadly it manages keybindings, but it only works on X11
systems -- that's not Win32/OS X (note that I know OS X provides X11, but
not as default). :)

On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 6:02 AM, Patrick Tulskie <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> So even if I got it to build it wouldn't work?
>
> I got it far enough along so that I get this:
> checking for LIBDO... configure: error: Package requirements (glib-2.0
> gdk-2.0 gdk-x11-2.0 gtk+-2.0) were not met
>
> I have all of those libraries in the Mono framework but the configure
> script can't seem to find them even after setting the LIBDO_LIBS to
> point at /Library/Frameworks/Mono.framework/Libraries
>
> Chris - I've never made OS X binaries myself before so I don't really
> have any expertise in building something like Do into a .app.  XCode
> usually does the work for me when I need a .app file.
>
> On Mar 28, 3:18 am, Bas <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It would still not be really usable -- no OSX specific applications would
> be
> > supported... even the ApplicationsItemSource would look for .desktop
> files,
> > instead of .app folders :)
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Chris Szikszoy <
> [email protected]>wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > It would be great if we could get someone to make OSX binaries.  Do
> > > you have any expertise in this area Patrick?
> >
> > > -Chris S.
> >
> > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Patrick Tulskie
> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > Ok great.  I'll have to give it a shot this weekend then.  I'm just
> > > > tired of how buggy and slow Quicksilver has been I'm curious as to
> > > > whether or not this will be a good replacement.
> >
> > > > On Mar 27, 12:38 am, David Siegel <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> Yes, a few have built and run Do on OS X. It should be pretty easy
> to do
> > > >> these days. Grab Macports, Mono, and chase dependencies until it
> runs.
> >
> > > >> David
> >
> > > >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Patrick Tulskie
> > > >> <[email protected]>wrote:
> >
> > > >> > Just out of curiosity - has anyone tried to build Do on OS X?  Are
> > > >> > there any reasons why it wouldn't build?  My initial interest in
> Do
> > > >> > was to get it working on Windows, but since I haven't used a
> Windows
> > > >> > box in months, I've kind passed on that idea.
> >
> >
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"GNOME Do" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/gnome-do?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to