On จ., 2005-09-19 at 23:07 +0200, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 02:11:32AM +0700, Ross Golder wrote: > > On ???., 2005-09-16 at 18:03 +0200, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 03:37:51PM +0200, Danilo Šegan wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > Maybe we should look into providing alternative status pages until > > > > Carlos responds. Anyone with a strong machine with a lot of unused > > > > CPU cycles on a fat-pipe willing to donate a couple of hours of > > > > runtime a day for our l10n-status pages? > > > > > > We could do that, at klid.dk. We did provide some alternate status for > > > gnome-i18n some years ago, so we have some idea of what is involved. > > > We have a 100 Mbit connection and quite some spare CPU cycles. Anyway > > > we would like to have it running in the night and niced. Please mail me > > > with info on how to proceed. > > > > Sounds good. Perhaps we should arrange for 'status.gnome.org' to point > > to the machine that hosts these pages. > > Hmm, I thought you had another offer. Anyway, I am still willing to > help. >
If you'd prefer not to host it on your own server, and if there is willing to maintain it, I expect some space could possibly be arranged on one of the real gnome.org servers. It's just easier for the GNOME sysadmins to set up a DNS entry than it is to set up new user accounts and a secure/capable hosting area etc. It would probably get rolling quicker if hosted externally, at least to begin with ;) -- Ross -- Ross _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
