On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 13:53 +0000, Simos wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Gintautas Miliauskas <gin...@akl.lt> wrote: > > Hello, > > > >> We currently are hosted in git.pitivi.org, but thanks to owen's help, > >> we now have a git repo in gnome.org also > >> (http://git.gnome.org/cgit/pitivi/ ) which we will be synchronizing with > >> the master repository on a regular basis. > > > > Which repository do you consider the "master"? svn.gnome.org or > > git.gnome.org? > > > > I am slightly annoyed by all this repository moving business. Look, if > > you want to move, fine, but *delete your project from the old > > repository* so that there is no confusion. You can always restore the > > project later if you want; despite being old-school, Subversion does > > allow that. There are hundreds of packages on svn.gnome.org, and > > translators can't be expected to track the whims of every project. > > Moreover, when they find out they have been spending time translating > > obsolete strings, they tend to get a little frustrated. > > > > I am also puzzled by your statement that translations are "too > > obsolete to backport". Obsolete? It's a PO file, you just merge it > > with the new POT and it's done. Backport? If the translations are > > already obsolete, where could one backport them? > > In addition to these questions, I'll add a one more. > The current situation with git.gnome.org is that any changes that take > place there > will get lost when the official migration happens. > Has there been a change to this?
That repository is a clean one, not a converted one. It will *NOT* get lost during the conversion since it will not be converted (according to Owen). The url I gave above IS the final one. > > Simos _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
