Am Donnerstag, den 16.04.2009, 12:05 +0200 schrieb Luca Ferretti: > I think that we translators are a little astonshed about the timing, > not about our own statistics.
Sometimes you find an issue just before you have to push a tarball. > I think a sequence like: > 1. produce and release 2.26.1 tgz > 2. warn this list about incoming POTFILES.in change > 3. change POTFILES.in in svn > would de more appreciated by translators. > > BTW, could we update the freeze rules about changes to POTFILES.in > while in string freeze? I'm not asking for release team approval, just > "developers have to notify gnome-i18n ML about the intent/need to > update POTFILES.in before change it". Developers do this afterwards currently, and I still don't see an argument here why an upcoming 2.26.1 release should be a reason not to fix a forgotten file in POTFILES.in, but instead wait and ship a release which includes untranslatable strings by purpose. Is it really all only about the "but I want 100% in my stats"? andre -- mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n