> I was about to say some thing along these lines, but you summarised it > better than what I would have done. I just want to added that every time > I use Transifex I find its UI very confusing and things that can be > simply achieved with damned-lies are either impossible or done in a very > convoluted way. I fail to say what features Transifex offers that we > need; we neither need the complex multi-project multi-team > multi-workflow setup nor the near useless online translation tool (if we > ever need one, then IMHO only Pootle is worthy consideration currently). I agree with most of what has been written before, but I'd like to make a call to see what functionalities do we miss in l10n: * commiting files from the web interface * sycn between projects not hosted in git.gnome.org
What else? Claude already said that the first point was already being discussed. Could you please refresh my mind about other points? Thanks. -- Jorge González González <alor...@gmail.com> Weblog: http://aloriel.no-ip.org Fotolog: http://www.flickr.com/photos/aloriel _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n