On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Kenneth Nielsen <k.nielse...@gmail.com> wrote: > Begging indeed, I can think of at least 4 different this can be done wrong > without a comment. I can't help but feel a bit disappointed that this was > missed in the i18n-process of the module.
Maybe I'm missing something, but why do you feel that a comment for this string is the solution? I honestly think it should be removed entirely and the corresponding one used from GTK+. Otherwise we leave the door open to inconsistencies. It frustrates me that these kinds of things can't be kept in one place so that it can be consistent across the whole desktop. Every now and then I get dates formatted wrong on my desktop just because some module hasn't been translated yet, even though date formats are centrally defined (actually in two "centres": my glibc locale and in glib). Friedel _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n