Hi Claude: On 09/30/2016 05:21:49 PM Fri, Claude Paroz wrote:
Le 30. 09. 16 à 17:24, Piotr Drąg a écrit :2016-09-30 12:29 GMT+02:00 Daniel Mustieles García <daniel.mustie...@gmail.com>:Hi all,We are monitoring the branch "Gtk3" for Balsa in DL, which has not movement since 2012, and has problems generating doc statistics. It makes sense to have this branch in DL? We also have linked this branck to the extra moduleset, instead of "master". I think we should change this, removing the gtk3 branch and just monitoring master branch. What do you think about this?Hi Daniel, gtk3 is actually the current development branch for balsa, as confirmed by the maintainer: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-i18n/2016-September/msg00041.html Hopefully, the docs problem will be fixed soon.Note that my answer in the above thread may not have reached Peter, as his provider is blocking my email domain. Claude
Thanks for pointing that out! Somehow I missed your reply on the list, too :( I need to simplify Makefile.am to use explicit lists--shouldn't take long, when I get an hour or two. The other thing we need to do with Balsa is make a stable gtk2 branch and get development back into master. We've been using the gtk3 branch for so long that I'm not looking forward to merging it back into master, but it needs to be done... Peter
pgpySmpB6vnGP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
