"Alexander Larsson" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think a bigger problem might be with document types where the assets > > aren't in the same file. For example, again with video, a Pitivi > > project would have a project file (which you'd open), and assets in > > the same directory.
I don't really like the word "silo" here. It has negative connotations, when per-application storage might well often be an appropriate choice. Also, it's a bit ambiguous, and implies that there's no way to get content out is the silo (which is what sharing and content selection aim to do). > Yeah, I'm not sure how to best solve that. One option is for pitivi to > have all files imported into the per-app data, like the app silo model. > That is kind of a large change though, and the video snippets imported > could easily be very large. ... > Maybe its good enough to say > that they'd have to be given full access to the Videos directory. Could some apps possibly have their own directory visible inside $HOME? Allan
_______________________________________________ gnome-os-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-os-list
