Alexander Larsson <[email protected]> wrote: >> I don't really like the word "silo" here. ... > True. Not sure of a better word. Application-local data?
Yeah. Or application-specific, application-exclusive, application-owned... >> > Yeah, I'm not sure how to best solve that. One option is for pitivi >> to >> > have all files imported into the per-app data, like the app silo >> model. >> > That is kind of a large change though, and the video snippets >> imported >> > could easily be very large. >> ... >> > Maybe its good enough to say >> > that they'd have to be given full access to the Videos directory. >> >> Could some apps possibly have their own directory visible inside >> $HOME? > > Each app gets a directory in ~/.var/app/$app-id/ where they can go wild. > This is visible to the session and to non-sandboxed apps. Right, but it isn't visible to the user via the file browser. What I'm suggesting (and it isn't a thoroughly thought out suggestion) is that, say, Pitivi is able to create ~/Pitivi, where you could drop video assets for use by the app. Allan _______________________________________________ gnome-os-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-os-list
