Well perhaps it would be best to tackle the individual issues...
I've linked to previous threads on my main issue with GNOME Shell
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-shell-list/2009-December/msg00052.html
Danté Ashton who started this particular discussion has an issue with:
"...the user, [having] to perform three extra clicks just to do what it takes
me one to do now?"
Денис Черемисов was less descriptive in their issue(s) though.
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:28:16 +0000
Subject: Re: All GNOME Shell Developers.
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]; [email protected]
Is this really the place to be discussing whether the general concept of
gnome-shell is a good one or not? I'm not saying that discussion shouldn't
happen, but isn't this mailing list for discussing how gnome-shell should be,
not whether it should be at all?
2009/12/18 Siegfried-A. Gevatter <[email protected]>
2009/12/18 Mark Curtis <[email protected]>:
> Taking one person's impressions and then saying the whole idea is great
> makes a lousy argument as well.
So? I don't think anybody implied that.
--
Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals (RainCT)
Free Software Developer 363DEAE3
_______________________________________________
gnome-shell-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141664/direct/01/_______________________________________________
gnome-shell-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
