On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Gantry York <gantry.y...@digitascio.com>wrote:

>
>
> On 12/05/2011 05:58 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
>
>  It's not ready for the corporate market, we've only had two releases and
>> things move slowly in the corporate world.
>>
>> Why not look into programming some of the functionality yourself and
>> share it with others?
>>
>
> Because that is not our companies mission.  We don't make operating
> systems or desktop environments.
>
>
Sure that makes sense.


> We do contribute to a couple other open-source projects but only because
> they directly relate to our product.
>
>
That's great that you give back!


> With regard to GNOME, we are happy to report bugs or provide usability
> feedback.  However, it doesn't seem as if anyone is interested in listening
> to the users.
>
>
We take our bugs seriously.  Please do file them as you see them.  We care
about GNOME and want to make sure that it is the best it can be.

Thanks,
sri



           On 12/05/2011 04:18 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:

               On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 17:08 -0700, Gantry York wrote:

                   GNOME3-shell wouldn't be so bad if it maintained
                   much of the
                   functionality that was in GNOME2.
                   Why can we only have dynamically allocated workspaces?

               There is already an extension for maintaining a number
               of static
               workstations.  See

               <
>> http://git.gnome.org/browse/__gnome-tweak-tool/tree/gtweak/__tweaks/tweak_windows.py
>>
>>                <http://git.gnome.org/browse/**
>> gnome-tweak-tool/tree/gtweak/**tweaks/tweak_windows.py<http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-tweak-tool/tree/gtweak/tweaks/tweak_windows.py>
>> >>
>>
>>                    Why not make it configurable so you can choose to
>>                    have predefined
>>                    workspace of dynamically created workspaces.
>>
>>                You can to that; now, today.
>>
>>
>>        ______________________________**___________________
>>        gnome-shell-list mailing list
>>        gnome-shell-list@gnome.org 
>> <mailto:gnome-shell-list@**gnome.org<gnome-shell-list@gnome.org>
>> >
>>        
>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/**__listinfo/gnome-shell-list<http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/__listinfo/gnome-shell-list>
>>
>>        
>> <http://mail.gnome.org/**mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-**list<http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list>
>> >
>>
>>
>>    --
>>    Gantry S. York
>>    Digitascio, Inc
>>    ______________________________**___________________
>>    gnome-shell-list mailing list
>>    gnome-shell-list@gnome.org 
>> <mailto:gnome-shell-list@**gnome.org<gnome-shell-list@gnome.org>
>> >
>>    
>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/**__listinfo/gnome-shell-list<http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/__listinfo/gnome-shell-list>
>>    
>> <http://mail.gnome.org/**mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-**list<http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Gantry S. York
> Digitascio, Inc
>
_______________________________________________
gnome-shell-list mailing list
gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list

Reply via email to