not to jump in, but if it isn't ready for the corporate market, then why is
gnome 2 no longer supported? Seems a bit rash to me then... I personally
think it *is* ready, but you must have that mindset as well.

On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna <s...@ramkrishna.me> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Gantry York <gantry.y...@digitascio.com>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 12/05/2011 05:58 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
>>
>>  It's not ready for the corporate market, we've only had two releases and
>>> things move slowly in the corporate world.
>>>
>>> Why not look into programming some of the functionality yourself and
>>> share it with others?
>>>
>>
>> Because that is not our companies mission.  We don't make operating
>> systems or desktop environments.
>>
>>
> Sure that makes sense.
>
>
>> We do contribute to a couple other open-source projects but only because
>> they directly relate to our product.
>>
>>
> That's great that you give back!
>
>
>> With regard to GNOME, we are happy to report bugs or provide usability
>> feedback.  However, it doesn't seem as if anyone is interested in listening
>> to the users.
>>
>>
> We take our bugs seriously.  Please do file them as you see them.  We care
> about GNOME and want to make sure that it is the best it can be.
>
> Thanks,
>
> sri
>
>
>
>            On 12/05/2011 04:18 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>
>                On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 17:08 -0700, Gantry York wrote:
>
>                    GNOME3-shell wouldn't be so bad if it maintained
>                    much of the
>                    functionality that was in GNOME2.
>                    Why can we only have dynamically allocated workspaces?
>
>                There is already an extension for maintaining a number
>                of static
>                workstations.  See
>
>                <
>>> http://git.gnome.org/browse/__gnome-tweak-tool/tree/gtweak/__tweaks/tweak_windows.py
>>>
>>>                <http://git.gnome.org/browse/**
>>> gnome-tweak-tool/tree/gtweak/**tweaks/tweak_windows.py<http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-tweak-tool/tree/gtweak/tweaks/tweak_windows.py>
>>> >>
>>>
>>>                    Why not make it configurable so you can choose to
>>>                    have predefined
>>>                    workspace of dynamically created workspaces.
>>>
>>>                You can to that; now, today.
>>>
>>>
>>>        ______________________________**___________________
>>>        gnome-shell-list mailing list
>>>        gnome-shell-list@gnome.org 
>>> <mailto:gnome-shell-list@**gnome.org<gnome-shell-list@gnome.org>
>>> >
>>>        
>>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/**__listinfo/gnome-shell-list<http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/__listinfo/gnome-shell-list>
>>>
>>>        
>>> <http://mail.gnome.org/**mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-**list<http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>    --
>>>    Gantry S. York
>>>    Digitascio, Inc
>>>    ______________________________**___________________
>>>    gnome-shell-list mailing list
>>>    gnome-shell-list@gnome.org 
>>> <mailto:gnome-shell-list@**gnome.org<gnome-shell-list@gnome.org>
>>> >
>>>    
>>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/**__listinfo/gnome-shell-list<http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/__listinfo/gnome-shell-list>
>>>    
>>> <http://mail.gnome.org/**mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-**list<http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Gantry S. York
>> Digitascio, Inc
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-shell-list mailing list
> gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
>
>


-- 
Sincerely,
    Josh
_______________________________________________
gnome-shell-list mailing list
gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list

Reply via email to