I'm going to ask around and see if there is anything else.. I've been
busy and it's obvious one person working on this isn't going to work.
I sent an email to Murray but this week i'm going to the Plone
Conference and will try to recruit more parties for this effort.
-C
On Sep 30, 2008, at 8:33 AM, Ramon Navarro Bosch wrote:
Hi guys !
I've been trying to see what to do and trying to upload all the code
you have been doing to svn.gnome.org. At svn.kernelcode.com/wgo I
can only see the 3 tempate lines adding a css to header.pt, where I
can get the other code?
Ramon
El 21/09/2008, a las 17:26, Christopher Warner escribió:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Murray Cumming
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 12:19 -0400, Christopher Warner wrote:
> You can do svn co svn://svn.kernelcode.com/wgo whateverdir
>
> The only people with write access are Jaime Soler, Johnathan
Wilde and
> myself, if anyone else wants to contribute patches let me know
ahead
> of time and I'll give you commit access. After we are done we'll
all
> do code review and then pass off to Murray. I know we all have been
> working on different pieces but I'd like everyone to start
committing
> small patches so things don't go to far and we end up with a merge
> nightmare.
This doesn't seem to be the best or easiest way to create patches for
individual fixes.
If you have a fix, I'd like it if you just submitted a patch
instead of
first committing it and lots of other fixes to a fork of the code.
Maybe
it will all be clearly ChangeLogged in the end, but this doesn't
seem a
likely way to achieve that.
--
Murray Cumming
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
This has to do more with working with the codebase.. The code still
has to be reviewed and a patch created before it's sent as a fix to
the svn.gnome.org tree.. It's just working without a version
control system is inherently difficult to see what's going on. This
has nothing to do with forking code or anything like that and
everything to do with making sure quality fixes and code are
committed in the first place. Eventually it can die off but right
now we need to test each others stuff and communicate. Due to the
very fact that everyone is short on time and we probably aren't
going to start [PATCH] roundabouts i'd rather have anyone that
wants to change something, commit or contribute do so. We can then
click a link, review, co.. test, changelog and send off to you with
little issue. When things smooth out and we all trust each other
and form some sort of routine we can drop it. That said, I respect
your opinion here, I just disagree with it.
-C
_______________________________________________
gnome-web-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list
_______________________________________________
gnome-web-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list
