I'm going to ask around and see if there is anything else.. I've been busy and it's obvious one person working on this isn't going to work. I sent an email to Murray but this week i'm going to the Plone Conference and will try to recruit more parties for this effort. -C
On Sep 30, 2008, at 8:33 AM, Ramon Navarro Bosch wrote: > > Hi guys ! > I've been trying to see what to do and trying to upload all the code you > have been doing to svn.gnome.org. At svn.kernelcode.com/wgo I can only see > the 3 tempate lines adding a css to header.pt, where I can get the other > code? > > Ramon > > > El 21/09/2008, a las 17:26, Christopher Warner escribió: > > On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 12:19 -0400, Christopher Warner wrote: >> > You can do svn co svn://svn.kernelcode.com/wgo whateverdir >> > >> > The only people with write access are Jaime Soler, Johnathan Wilde and >> > myself, if anyone else wants to contribute patches let me know ahead >> > of time and I'll give you commit access. After we are done we'll all >> > do code review and then pass off to Murray. I know we all have been >> > working on different pieces but I'd like everyone to start committing >> > small patches so things don't go to far and we end up with a merge >> > nightmare. >> >> This doesn't seem to be the best or easiest way to create patches for >> individual fixes. >> >> If you have a fix, I'd like it if you just submitted a patch instead of >> first committing it and lots of other fixes to a fork of the code. Maybe >> it will all be clearly ChangeLogged in the end, but this doesn't seem a >> likely way to achieve that. >> >> -- >> Murray Cumming >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> www.murrayc.com >> www.openismus.com >> >> > This has to do more with working with the codebase.. The code still has to > be reviewed and a patch created before it's sent as a fix to the > svn.gnome.org tree.. It's just working without a version control system is > inherently difficult to see what's going on. This has nothing to do with > forking code or anything like that and everything to do with making sure > quality fixes and code are committed in the first place. Eventually it can > die off but right now we need to test each others stuff and communicate. Due > to the very fact that everyone is short on time and we probably aren't going > to start [PATCH] roundabouts i'd rather have anyone that wants to change > something, commit or contribute do so. We can then click a link, review, > co.. test, changelog and send off to you with little issue. When things > smooth out and we all trust each other and form some sort of routine we can > drop it. That said, I respect your opinion here, I just disagree with it. > -C > _______________________________________________ > gnome-web-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list > > > >
_______________________________________________ gnome-web-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list
