On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 19:41 +0100, Simon Geusebroek wrote: > Yes, I know I'm asking a lot to Arch, but since it's also a revision > control system, and that I have justly revisions to control, I'm sure > it would be clever enough to manage to do what I'm asking to it :).
It's still not clear why you'd prefer to revision control the binary files rather than the source. -- Matthew Dempsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
