Hello to all people who answered to my question, I just wanted to give you a warm thank you (and I agree with you Tom Lord, "waste" was a badly chosen word (sounds like garbage…), and my English language really needs to be improved…).
Thank you again, Simon Geusebroek. On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 18:12:04 -0800 (PST), Tom Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Because I'm not using Arch for software development: I have to version > > control live-CDs, that is to say complete workspaces. Managing only > > source files would imply complete compilation of a system from the > > kernel to the Open Office suite passing by all modules, desktop > > environment, web browser and all other software needed by users: this > > would be anything else than a waste of time > > You are simply wrong (about "waste"). You appear to not understand > the nature of the raw materials you are working with. > > Sadly, you are very far from being alone in this mistake. > > -t > _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
