From: Aaron Bentley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tom Lord wrote: > Sorry if I was unclear. I think the `<user-name>' should be pretty > free-form (unlike Arch 1.x) and the `<checksum>' part is so that if > two users happen to choose the same `<user-name>', at least a "fully > qualified" version of that commit name (one that includes the > checksum) will presumably disambiguate.
So by '<user-name>', you mean something like '[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tla--devo--2.0--patch-5', not 'tlord' or '[EMAIL PROTECTED]', right? (And then we can relax the restrictions on the non-checksum part.) Right. It's a user's name for a revision, not the user's own name. -t _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
