Mikhael Goikhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> have both --full and --no-full options in one-version-plus commands.
> But I may accept any client behaviour, as long as it does not remove
> functionality.
This is what my branch[1] currently does.
,----
| $ baz logs | head -3
| base-0
| patch-1
| patch-2
| $ baz logs --full | head -3
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]/bazaar--revision-list--1.4--base-0
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]/bazaar--revision-list--1.4--patch-1
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]/bazaar--revision-list--1.4--patch-2
| $ baz logs --no-full | head -3
| base-0
| patch-1
| patch-2
| $ baz log | head -3
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]/bazaar--revision-list--1.4--patch-12
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]/bazaar--revision-list--1.4--patch-11
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]/bazaar--revision-list--1.4--patch-10
`----
--full and --no-full are allways present, cancel each other, but one
is actually useless.
More details on the wiki[2]. Everybody is welcome to try it and give
opinion before this gets merged in the mainline. By "opinion", I mean
either something constructive or a simple "it rocks"/"it sucks" ...
Actually, I realize the user interface still needs a big cleanup. Too
many commands are close from each other and could easily be grouped
(The abrowse/rbrowse couple is the best example, but is not the only
one). More details and comments welcome on the wiki page too.
Thanks,
--
Matthieu
[1] [EMAIL PROTECTED]/bazaar--revision-list--1.4
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/arch/public
[2] http://wiki.gnuarch.org/FrontEndFriendly
_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
