2005/7/12, nick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Wow. Mercurial really rocks! > They repository consume less space (2,069,732) than tla-1.x (2,994,487) > and revc (14,498,601) on same data. > It's faster than revc on same data.
Can you comment on my impression that mercurial[*] seems to lack useful rename support? When I tried it, it treated renames as add+delete (which screws up merging). If true, it's a fatal flaw I think. [*] I earlier referred to it incorrectly as "mercury". -Miles -- Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
