Miles Bader wrote:
2005/7/12, nick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Wow. Mercurial really rocks!
They repository consume less space (2,069,732) than tla-1.x (2,994,487)
and revc (14,498,601) on same data.
It's faster than revc on same data.
Can you comment on my impression that mercurial[*] seems to lack
useful rename support? When I tried it, it treated renames as
add+delete (which screws up merging).
If true, it's a fatal flaw I think.
[*] I earlier referred to it incorrectly as "mercury".
I show this timings generally for Arch developers.
Why _small_ (distrib size 81760 bytes!), written on python
SCM with compressed delta format of repository faster than
written on C with snapshot based repository?
Regards,
Dmitriy
_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
