also sprach Matthieu Moy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.08.24.1002 +0200]: > > Imagine 100 users. Imagine the pain. I want in-archive hooks! > > Then, why did you delete Method 1 and Method 2 ?
I am not acquainted with pqm yet and thus don't trust in its abilities. Method 2 is clearly a bottleneck I would not want in my projects of this size. > Think of pqm as a centralized archive with a smart server. It's > just not implemented in the same way (pqm is an extra layer, not > in the core protocol), but it offers roughly the same service. /me notes to do homework -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED] invalid/expired pgp (sub)keys? use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! spamtraps: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "if builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker that came along would destroy civilization." -- gerald weinberg
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
