Hello everyone, I have been wondering about the same thing...there must be some interest in maintaining GNU Arch?
I have also been wondering about the state of GNU Arch documentation. Anyone? -Frank --- Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm wondering about the future of GNU Arch users. > I've been using tla > for a year or so and I've always considered it a > good tool, even today. > However, it seems that many (most?) people on this > list don't consider > tla/baz as valuable tools anymore and are > considering moving to GIT or > Bazaar 2 ASAP (which is, IMO, quite a radical > change). > > Anyway, does anyone have interest in maintaining > tla? A pre-1.4 release > was announced in February but 1.4 never went out; > additionally, 1.3.3 is > broken on some architectures (at least SPARC and > PPC). > > The funny thing is that while GNU Arch is already > being buried, other > people are re-implementing the old CVS (see > http://opencvs.org)... ;-) > > Thanks, > Ludovic. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gnu-arch-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users > > GNU arch home page: > http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/ > ___________________________________________________________ To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
